Issue: 25 – May 2008 | |
Lisbon Treaty Voter guide | |
Courtesy of the National Platform – www.nationalplatform.org
THE LISBON TREATY – WHY WE SHOULD BE CONCERNED LISBON – NOT JUST ANOTHER EU TREATY Below are the two key sentences of the amendment which you will be asked to put into the Irish Constitution on Thursday 12 June. If people vote Yes they will be giving the European Union the constitutional form of a Federal EU State, in which Ireland would become a provincial state or region. This would be the end of Irelands position as an independent sovereign country. The French and Dutch have already rejected this proposal in referendums. By voting No we remain full EU Members based on the Nice Treaty, but we reject the Lisbon Treaty as a step too far. Millions of Europeans who are being denied referendums on Lisbon by their politicians, are hoping that we will say No to it for their sakes. The State may ratify the Treaty of Lisbon signed at Lisbon on the 13th day of December 2007, and may be a member of the European Union established by virtue of that Treaty. No provision of this [Irish] Constitution invalidates laws enacted, acts done or measures adopted by the State that are necessitated by membership of the European Union, or prevents laws enacted, acts done or measures adopted by the said European Union or by institutions thereof, or by bodies competent under the treaties referred to in this section, from having the force of law in the State. (emphasis added) The Lisbon Treaty would: 1. Establish a legally quite new European Union in the constitutional form of a Federal EU State. This new EU based on the Lisbon Treaty would have the same name but would be fundamentally different from the present EU, which was founded by the 1993 Maastricht Treaty. Lisbon would turn Ireland into a provincial or regional state within this new Union, with the EUs Constitution and laws being made superior to the Irish Constitution and laws in any case of conflict between the two. It would be the end of Irelands position as an independent sovereign State in the international community of States (Arts.1 and 47 TEU; Declaration No.17 concerning Primacy); 2. Turn us all into real citizens for the first time of this new post-Lisbon European Union, owing obedience to its laws and loyalty to its authority over and above our obedience and loyalty to Ireland and the Irish Constitution and laws. One can only be a citizen of a State. We would retain our Irish citizenship, but it would be subordinate to our EU Federal citizenship, as is normal for citizens of Federal States such as Germany, the USA, Switzerland, Canada etc. (Art.9 TEU); 3. Be a power-grab by the Big States for control of this new Union. By basing EU law-making primarily on population size, the Lisbon Treaty would double Germanys say on the EU Council of Ministers from 8% to 17%. Frances say would go from 8% to 13%, Britains and Italys from their current 8% to 12% each. Irelands voting weight on a population basis would be more than halved to 1% (Art.16 TEU); 4. Amend the existing treaties to give the EU Court of Justice the power to rule against Irelands 12.5% company tax rate if it decides that this is a distortion of competition in the EU internal market as compared with Germanys 30% rate (Art.113 TFEU). This low rate of tax is the principal reason for foreign firms coming to Ireland and staying here when they come. Lisbon would also give the EU the power to impose its own EU taxes directly on us for the first time (Art.311 TFEU); 5. Copperfasten last Decembers Laval/Vaxholm judgement of the EU Court of Justice, which makes it illegal for Governments or Trade Unions to enforce pay standards higher than the minimum wage for migrant workers. At the same time Lisbon would give the EU full control of immigration policy (Art.79 TFEU). This combination threatens the pay and working conditions of large numbers of Irish people. A new Treaty Protocol is needed to set the Laval judgement aside; 6. Remove any Irish voice from the EU Commission, the body which has the monopoly of proposing all EU laws, for five years out of every 15 (Art.17.5 TEU); 7. Abolish our right to decide who the Irish Commissioner is when it comes to our turn to be on the Commission, replacing it by a right to make suggestions only for the new Commission President to decide (Art.17.7 TEU); 8. Hand over to the EU the power to make laws binding on us in 32 new policy areas, such as crime, justice and policing, public services, immigration, energy, transport, tourism, sport, culture, public health, the EU budget etc.; 9. Give the EU Court of Justice the power to decide our rights as EU citizens, including such matters as the right to life, the right to strike, the rights of the child, the right to fair trial etc. Irelands Supreme Court would no longer have the final say on what our rights are (Art.6 TEU); 11. Militarize the EU further, requiring Member States to progressively improve their military capabilities and to go to the defence of other Member States in the event of war (Art.42.7 TEU). HOW THE LISBON TREATY WILL AFFECT YOUR PAY 1. Lisbon will copperfasten last Decembers Laval/Vaxholm judgement of the EU Court of Justice, which makes it illegal for Governments or Trade Unions to enforce pay standards higher than the minimum wage for migrant workers. At the same time Lisbon would give the EU full control of immigration policy (Art.79 TFEU). This combination threatens the pay and working conditions of large numbers of Irish people. A new Treaty Protocol is needed to set this judgement aside. 2. It will give the EU Court of Justice the power to rule against Irelands 12.5% company tax rate if it decides that this is a distortion of competition as compared with Germanys 30% rate (Art.113 TFEU). This low rate of tax is the principal reason for foreign firms coming to Ireland and staying here when they come. YOUR SAY 4. It is a power-grab by the Big States for control of the new post-Lisbon European Union. By basing EU law-making primarily on population size, the Lisbon Treaty would double Germanys say on the EU Council of Ministers from 8% to 17%. Frances say would go from 8% today to 13%, and Britains and Italys from their current 8% to 12% each. Irelands voting weight on a population basis would be more than halved to 1% (Art.16 TEU). 5. It removes any Irish voice from the EU Commission, the body which has the monopoly of proposing all EU laws, for five years out of every 15 (Art.17.5 TEU). 6. It abolishes our right to decide who the Irish Commissioner is when it comes to our turn to be on the Commission, replacing it by a right to make suggestions only for the Commission President to decide (Art.17.7 TEU). 7. It will establish a legally quite new European Union in the constitutional form of a Federal EU State. This new EU based on the Lisbon Treaty would have the same name but would be fundamentally different from the present EU, which was founded by the 1993 Maastricht Treaty. Lisbon would turn Ireland into a provincial or regional state within this new Union, with the EUs Constitution and laws being made superior to the Irish Constitution and laws in any case of conflict between the two. It would be the end of Irelands position as an independent sovereign State in the international community of States (Arts.1 and 47 TEU; Declaration No.17 concerning Primacy); 8. It will turn us all into real citizens for the first time of this new post-Lisbon European Union, owing obedience to its laws and loyalty to its authority over and above our obedience and loyalty to Ireland and the Irish Constitution and laws. One can only be a citizen of a State. We would retain our Irish citizenship, but it would be subordinate to our EU Federal citizenship, as is normal for citizens of Federal States such as Germany, the USA, Switzerland, Canada etc. (Art.9 TEU). 9. Lisbon is a self-amending Treaty which would permit the EU Prime Ministers to shift most of the remaining policy areas where unanimity still exists, to majority voting, without need for new EU Treaties or referendums (Art.48 TEU). YOUR WAY OF LIFE 10. It will give the EU Court of Justice the power to decide our rights as EU citizens, including such matters as the right to life, the right to strike, the rights of the child, the right to fair trial etc. Irelands Supreme Court would no longer have the final say (Art.6 TEU). 11. It hands over to the EU the power to make laws binding on us in 32 new policy areas, such as crime, justice and policing, public services, immigration, energy, transport, tourism, sport, culture, public health, the EU budget etc. 12. It will militarize the EU further, requiring Member States to progressively improve their military capabilities and to go to the defence of other Member States in the event of war (Art.42.7 TEU). This would make a mockery of traditional Irish neutrality and any pretence to an independent Irish foreign policy. Public opinion will be led to adopt, without knowing it, the proposals that we dare not present to them directly – All the earlier proposals will be in the new text, but will be hidden and disguised in some way. – V.Giscard DEstaing, former French President, who helped draw up the EU Constitution which the French and Dutch rejected in their 2005 referendums but which is now being implemented through the Lisbon Treaty; Le Monde, 14 June 2007 |
|
|
Archive for the ‘Issue 25’ Category
Lisbon Treaty Voter guide
1 Bealtaine, 2008Interview with Declan Ganley
1 Bealtaine, 2008Issue: 25 – May 2008 | |
Interview with Declan Ganley | |
Declan Ganley was born in North London of Irish parents. The family moved back to Ireland when he was still a child. A successful entrepreneur, the Galway-based businessman shocked the Establishment by his strong opposition to the Lisbon Treaty, which he has eloquently argued is bad for Ireland and Irish business interests. His organisation Libertas has been actively campaigning for a No vote in the forthcoming referendum on the Treaty and he has been travelling the country to present their case on the issue to the Irish people.
What is Libertas? Could Lisbon affect our tax rates? How will Lisbon affect Irelands influence within the EU? Do you think there is any national consciousness of the fact that this is one of the most important decisions we will ever make? Article 50 says that you can withdraw. Now, you have to pay the European Union – theyll tell you how much money you owe to them and all of that stuff. Oh, and by the way, Europe can fine us, but we cant fine them. See whos really in charge here. Article 50 means that a member state can withdraw. Now, bearing in mind how fundamentally anti-democratic this treaty is, just think about the highly unlikely scenario that we get a bad President of Europe. Im sure that would never happen, right? But lets just say that we were unlucky, and we got a bad President of Europe and a bad Foreign Minister of Europe, and that the scandals that are being covered up in Europe right now of very many millions of waste, fraud and abuse and embezzlement – lets say that those scandals become more widely and publicly known. Do you think that its going to be tempting for a political party in any number of member states to be opportunistic and say, this European Union is out of touch, out of control and we have no one that we can vote for or against – we should leave, and we are going to run a general election campaign on leaving the Union. Its extremely likely – and it will happen, probably next door. Its very possible that things could go very wrong and that some party could win an election on that commitment – to exercise Article 50, and leave – and there, because of the anti-democratic nature of this thing, it makes the likelihood of withdrawal from some member states high. So you could have Britain, leaving – Denmark, leaving – the Netherlands, leaving – Sweden, leaving – and a renting, a splitting of Europe again along some very old lines – and we cannot afford to go back there and have that happen. Its an enormous risk – which is why we have to recognise that Europe belongs to the close to half-a-billion people who are Europeans. That is what Europe is. Its not some small clique of elites in Brussels. It must be accountable to that close to half-a-billion people at the ballot box – thats democracy. For all the reasons I have outlined, and more, we have to say no to this – even if it was just out of respect for the French and the Dutch – but for all of these reasons we have to say no. By the way, what does Ireland get in this treaty that we dont already have? Nothing. Not a single thing. What kind of deal is that? So we are giving up massive power and influence. We surrender and subjugate ourselves to unaccountable leadership – we are going to have these people [travelling around the globe] purporting to represent us as European citizens – we open these back doors to taxation – we are having our voting weight halved in the European Council – we are losing our European Commissioner for five out of every fifteen years – and in return we get what? Nothing that we dont already have. Why do you think there is such a national political consensus? You have the gravy train factor as well. Theres a big cover-up going on. The EU hasnt had its accounts signed off by its own auditors for fourteen years. If they were in business theyd be struck off and jailed by now. If that was national government, they would have resigned. It would never have been allowed to go this long. Fourteen years, they havent had their accounts signed off for. There isnt a small business in Europe, there isnt a sweetshop that hasnt had its accounts signed off in fourteen years – and were supposed to give these people more power? Are we even having this discussion? Democracy is something that is not debatable. Democracy is very fragile in Europe. Its only been around, across Europe, since after the war. Its not debatable! If you are going to rule and make laws for the people, you have to make yourself accountable at the ballot box – or get lost! Thats why we have got to say no and send this thing back. If we say no this will be the third time that this package has been rejected. They will not be able to ignore it this time – and lets send Brian Cowen back with a mandate from the Irish people to say that this was a bad deal, they rejected it, we couldnt sell it, God knows we tried, we lied through our teeth to try and get this thing through. We need a better deal. And if he wont do that, lets make the 2009 European elections right across Europe be an issue of, ok, what is the future of Europe going to be? and lets force them to explain how the instruments of governance in Europe are going to be made more accountable. Europe does need a constitution. It needs to be successful. We cannot risk Europe failing, weve come too far. But taking it off the cliff, as this treaty does, is absolutely the wrong thing. The most pro-European thing that we can do is be pro the half-a-billion people of Europe, and we need to hand Europe back to them by saying no to this Lisbon Treaty. Declan, we all see the Treaty as a failure, but what specifically would Libertas advocate, that would be acceptable? I want a tool to apply democratic accountability to those lawmakers in Brussels. If theres going to be a President of Europe and a Foreign Minister, let that person present themselves for election to the people of Europe – for us to vote them up or down, and be able to hold them accountable to us. I do not want Brussels, the policy makers and lawmakers to be unavoidably open to the enormous influence of lobbyists against the voices of the people. As it stands we have to go and get a million signatures to get our voices heard. I want these tax back doors that are open to affect the overall tax situation and tax-competitiveness of Ireland made so that they really work. This veto [on tax] – its like trying to anchor a ship with a tiny piece of cotton thread. They say, well its tied to the dock – with a piece of dental floss. We need something thats going to really protect our tax competitiveness. There are things in this treaty that I [personally] would like to see gone. For instance, Brussels gives itself the power and authority to intervene in even issues like children – to guarantee the physical an moral integrity in sporting issues especially with the young. So, Brussels is going to be the guarantor of my childrens moral standards in sporting and education functions? They are giving themselves that power. What are their morals? I need to know first. Are they the same as the ones that I want for my children? Are they going to be telling me, and setting down laws that my wife and I completely and fundamentally disagree with, for our children? Who the hell told them that they should have the right to reach down into my family and set moral standards, whatever their moral standards are, for my children? Get the hell out of my family! I dont want you in there. I dont know who you are. You never have to ask me for a vote. Stay away! There are things in there that are an absolute insult to our intelligence, and where there is massive overreach in this thing. It is open to such massive and wide interpretation. This was McEvaddys point. He said, you could challenge every line of this thing. The US Constitution is thirteen A4 pages – its done them for 250 years. McEvaddy said what we need to do is give them twenty blank sheets of paper and say make it fit on that first. Thats your first job, and make sure that everyone can understand and read it, and then we will look at it again. Thats your mission statement. The Larkin Declaration which set this whole thing off in train was supposed to bring Europe closer to its citizens. This does exactly the opposite. But, the question why the political parties are doing this, it boggles the mind. Education. Vocational training, youth and sport. It says here, the Union shall contribute to the promotion of European sporting issues while taking account of the specific nature of the sport, its structures based on voluntary activity, and its social and educational function. It gives itself this role of developing the European dimension in sport. Now, the European dimension, (whats that?) … by promoting fairness and openness in sporting competitions, (thats nice, right), and co-operation between bodies responsible for sports, and by protecting the physical and moral integrity of sportsmen and sportswomen, especially the youngest sportsmen and sportswomen. They are going to protect my childrens moral integrity. I dont need them to protect my childrens moral integrity. Thats weird stuff. The other thing to bear in mind is that we give up a veto in that. Its a QMV issue. Thats a very good point. So whatever they do here, we cant stop it. It means that our children could be indoctrinated. Absolutely. Well actually no you cant say that Johnny, you cant bless yourself before a game because that would suggest that you might have some kind of religion or something. Sing the Euro Song and off you go. Think about all the bad things that could happen with that. Article 48 says something to the effect that anything we havent thought about in all this, we can do afterwards. Again, they call us liars. Once they cant defeat us on the facts they just say that that is a red herring. Do you find yourself to be the victim of a smear campaign? In the event that the people vote no, where does that leave the whole European project bearing in mind that a European Green speaking in Galway said that the Irish vote was irrelevant? Its wishful thinking on his part. Well, lets say no and then see how irrelevant it is. If it is so irrelevant why is Angela Merkel and Barroso and all these people over? Look, if we say no, and I firmly believe we will, if we say no, the status quo remains. Nothing slows down, nothing goes out of control. And you could argue do you want this thing to work more efficiently while it isnt democratically accountable? Why is that good? Is efficiency always a good thing? We do need to become a more capable global actor, I firmly believe that, I want to see that happen. We need to get competitive, this certainly doesnt provide for that. We need to get innovative. We need to re-establish ourselves as serious world leaders. This should be the European century, I dont accept that it has to be the Asian century. I think we can have a huge and real renaissance in European influence in the world, but its got to be based on the fundamentals of democracy, rule of law, and accountability to the peoples of Europe, because ultimately power is vested in you and you delegate it to those who legislate and make the laws. What about the EU military issue? Whos to say that the European army couldnt be used against a section of the people? I didnt say that. But, if theres no accountability? In the US theres a big thing called posse-comitatus, part of their body of law which very much restricts the ability of the US military to act within the continental United States. Whatever you think about the American system and the war, they are ultimately accountable to a civilian leadership who are ultimately accountable to the people, which is why there is such a healthy debate going on in the US about the war [in Iraq], because people know that the people they are going to have to answer to are at the ballot box. It is. Thats true, and look, its a far from perfect system. But I tell you what, its a hell of a lot better than being closely linked with the arms trade and never having to ask for a vote. Thats the lobbyist kind of relationship – if you can pay the four of five million euro to the lobbyist and the guy never has to get elected, as a lobbyist you are going to have huge sway and influence, and this [the EU] is the same organisation that wants to cover up reports into corruption within the organs of Brussels. Is part of the plan to build a military block to challenge China? Let me tell you this: I am an ardent proponent of Irish neutrality under this formula. We cannot be part of a common European defence that isnt accountable to a democratically elected civilian leadership. Do you find that youve had, for want of a better term, sister groups throughout Europe who are looking towards Ireland with this referendum in sight? No, not sister groups, but individuals, and lots and lots and lots of them. The media are saying that we have to get in line. Brown reneged on a Labour manifesto commitment to have a referendum. Let me tell you, there is one career that could be teetering on the edge of the Irish result, and thats Gordon Browns position as Prime Minister of Britain. If we say no, given all of the other pressures that hes under, it might be very difficult for Gordon Brown to stay on as Prime Minister, having reneged on his referendum commitment. There will be a huge call for his resignation. There is speculation that Berties recent departure had more to do with the referendum than anything else. Would you concur with that? They are saying that they need a high turnout for a yes vote, but I think that a high turnout is going to produce a no vote on this occasion. If we have that high turnout they can now not say that people were voting against the Government. So, they have put themselves in the situation where the only defence that they had to de-legitimise the result here is now gone. It was a huge boost for us. And it also exposes their weaknesses. It showed their fear. But when you put it in perspective it is important. By the way, Barroso said that theres no Plan B if we say no. Now, I tell you, thats a very interesting statement on his part because it reduces the possibilities to three things. He says that there is no Plan B, so, given that one of the primary functions of government and people responsible for legislation, etc., is contingency planning, hes the President of the European Commission, do you think he should have a contingency plan? He has no contingency plan. He should resign. He is incompetent if he has no contingency plan. He should resign or be fired, immediately. He is derelict in his duty to the people of Europe. Or, two: there is a Plan B and they are not telling us what it is. Its another one of their many cover-ups. Or three, hes just lying. Its hilarious, you know, the stuff that these guys come out with. So, thats it. Thank you. Website: http://www.libertas.org |
Catholic forces mobilise
1 Bealtaine, 2008Issue: 25 – May 2008 | |
Catholic forces mobilise | |
For months now pro-life Catholic Nationalist activists have been quietly mobilising in preparation for the Lisbon Treaty Referendum. Groups such as Éire go Brách and CIR have been organising throughout the Twenty-Six Counties since late last year and they are now in full campaign mode. In addition to holding meetings aimed at informing the public about the serious dangers Lisbon poses for the Irish Nation and our Catholic culture, several organisations have been engaged in door-to-door canvassing and thousands of households, particularly in Munster, have already received highly informative campaign literature on the Treaty. Well placed activists have told The Hibernian that the overwhelming majority of those canvassed have come out categorically in favour of the No side. Campaigners are eagerly awaiting the announcement of an official date for the referendum so that they can swing fully into action for the occasion. At the beginning of last year, The Hibernian predicted that Ireland would witness the rise of Catholic Nationalism throughout the Thirty-Two Counties; and this has been the case. Among the successes to date have been preventing the extension of the 1967 British Abortion Act to the Six-Counties and the halting of legislation promoting homosexual marriage in the South. The next target is Lisbon. May God Bless the work of Catholic Irish Nationalists in this great endeavour. Websites: |